For new blog posts, please visit our new blog located at http://emilyprogramfoundation.org/news-events/blog/.
Please contact us at info@emilyprogramfoundation.org with questions.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Monday, April 1, 2013
Media Monday: Slim Peace
Submitted by Britt Ahlstrom, TEPF
Volunteer
Could a healthy living support
group bring Israeli and Palestinian woman together? Fat chance, you say? Tell
that to Slim Peace, a support group for women of various religions who want to
improve their eating habits and self-esteem. The group was founded in the Middle East, but as reported in The New York Times, the group has now made its way to
Boston, Massachusetts. I’d like to see it spread.
Some eating disorder awareness advocates
might be opposed to the propagation of weight loss support groups, and I’ll
admit it could use a less weight-focused name. But we shouldn’t be so quick to
scrape this group off our plates. For one thing, it promotes the sensible Mediterranean
Diet, not one of the numerous “lose weight fast” fad diets. The group also
teaches attendees to tap into their spiritual sides, guiding them through
mindful eating and connecting with their “inner power.” The 10-week group even
culminates with a shared meal.
But the most central reason I love
this group? Christian groups bring together Christians. Liberal groups bring
together liberals. But eating groups can bring together everyone. Regardless of your gender, race, religion, political
stance, or sexual orientation, if you live in the United States (or the Middle
East, or Asia, or on the planet Earth), you probably struggle with food, even
if just sometimes.
Many
people struggle with food. With having too little or with eating too much. With
feeling hungry or with “feeling fat.” Food has power around the globe. It can
instigate riots, spur legislation, and enrich or deplete lives.
But
food can also bring together families. It can help us cross boundaries of
culture and ideology. That’s exactly what I think Slim Peace is about, and it’s
something we all could use a little more of.
Monday, March 25, 2013
Media Monday: Pinning Health at Every Size
Submitted by TEPF Volunteer
There are so many social
networking programs that exist today, and Pinterest is certainly one of the
most popular. Just like any other social networking program in which people
would get hooked on to, the purpose of Pinterest is to share ideas with other
people and these ideas are easily accessible to anyone. Everyone that uses Pinterest
uses it for different purposes. The most common uses are wedding ideas, crafts,
recipes and health. But when you look at the “Health & Fitness” and “Food
& Drink” boards, are they encouraging eating disorders?
The majority of the images and
information provided on these boards, you see phrases like, “Pool workout that
burns mega calories and tones every Trouble spot”, “11 Easy Lunches to Lose
Weight”, “25 meals that allow you to eat your feelings, the healthy way”. These
pins certainly reinforce the idea that it is “normal” to be burning “mega-calories”
per day, or eat certain foods to lose 10 pounds in a week. But, it is clear
that these behaviors can often be destructive to one’s health. For example if
someone starts diet X and then after a couple days, they are not satisfied with
the results, they will continue other dieting methods to achieve the desired
results. These dieting methods will required your body to undergo extreme
measures. Pinterest does have policies
in place to ensure that pins are not promoting behaviors that are clearly
harmful, but what about the pins that are inadvertently so?
In general, society has misinterpreted
their views on what is “normal.” It is important for us to redefine the
definition of “normal” living. Pinterest
wants people to network with others and share common ideas, so it’s time to
start sharing the idea of health at every size with others. It is time to start sharing the idea that
health means many different things, not just a number on a scale. The messages
behind those pins are powerful. So, what
are you going to pin today?
Friday, March 22, 2013
Action Alert!
Action Needed Now!
(posted on behalf of NAMI and the entire mental health community)
The Minnesota house and senate have set their budget
“targets.” What does this mean? It means that they give a certain amount
of money to each committee to spend in their area (transportation, education,
etc.) thus creating the state budget.
The Emily Program Foundation and the entire mental health
community are extremely upset that the target for health and human services is
lower than the Governor’s proposed budget and will require CUTS in
health and human services of around $150 Million. This means that not only will
we not be able to have new spending for things such as school-linked mental
health, family psycho-education, crisis services, supportive housing or rate
increases to providers - but we will see cuts to programs.
We believe that if we act now we can change this scenario.
If you believe that our mental health system is underfunded and fragile, you
need to act. If you believe that it is very difficult to obtain the treatment
and supports needed for children or adults with mental illnesses, you need to
act.
Here is what we need every advocate to do:
- Call the leadership of
the house and senate and say “ I (live with a mental illness, have a
family member/child with a mental illness, work in the mental health field)
and I strongly urge you to increase the target for the health and human
services budget. The mental health system has been cut over $60 million
the past four years and it cannot take any more cuts. Do not balance the
budget on the backs of children and adults with mental illnesses.”
Make the calls NOW and TOMORROW. The phone numbers are: Senator
Bakk, 651-296-8881;Senator Sieben, 651-297-8060;Representative Thissen,
651-296-5375;Representative Murphy, 651-296-8799
- Call your own state
senator and representative and leave that same message. If your legislator
is holding a town hall meeting next week, attend it and give them that
same message. One thing to remember is that there are “internal” politics
and so our friends who want to change this need to say “I am hearing from
my constituents.”
- Write a letter to the
editor. Remember, the legislature is taking a break next week. We would
like to see letters to the editor in every paper, particularly the ones in
greater Minnesota. Trust us when we say that this will have a huge impact.
Since many papers are weekly – please send it now. Here is the basic
outline for your letter, please put it in your own words:
Please take action today. We cannot wait. Our mental
health system cannot withstand further cuts.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Media Monday: Body objectification gone too far
Submitted by TEPF Volunteer
Similar
articles:
Most are
probably familiar with the murder charges against South African Oscar Pistorius,
who previously wowed the world by being the first double-legged amputee to
participate in the Olympics. Unfortunately, his recent claim to fame is much
less glorious. Regardless of it being premeditated or accidental, his murder of
girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp is a great tragedy. Another tragedy is the
media’s coverage of the incident. Magazines like the Sun, the Mail and
even The New York Post all covered the story by choosing to use photos of Reeva
posing sexily in a bikini. The Huffington Post joined in by posting an online
slideshow of bikini shots. Yes, she was a swimwear model. However, she
also had a law degree, campaigned against violence towards women, and modeled
cosmetics for Avon. Reeva was a very intelligent, successful women and advocate.
It is a shame that the media disproportionately praised her physical
attributes.
To be
clear, I am not saying there is anything wrong with modeling swimwear. However,
I do find it distasteful (and frankly creepy) to objectify the body of a murder
victim. It demonstrates how far the media will go to sell magazines, which
brings up a bigger issue: why does the sexualisation of women’s (and men’s)
bodies sell magazines? Why has the coverage of this tragedy caused seemingly
little uproar in the US, while hundreds of people in the UK posted their
disgust on Twitter and Facebook?
Perhaps
we are becoming so accustomed to the way the media objectifies us, that we
hardly notice when they run stories like Reeva’s. Or perhaps we are too
busy self-evaluating and feeling bad about ourselves to do anything about
it. A recent study published in Psychological Science, found
that women who often evaluated themselves based on their appearance and sexual
desirability had a decreased motivation to challenge gender-based inequalities
and injustices.
So, the
media promotes this status quo that makes us feel bad about ourselves which in
turn decreases our motivation to stand up against it. This is great for
magazine sales, but bad for us. We must find a way to break this vicious
cycle and it starts with acknowledging these issues and standing up against
them. Challenge the status quo, view the media critically, and use your voice
to advocate for yourself and others.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Media Monday: Response to Advertising
Submitted by TEPF Volunteer
The ad in question is that of Ketel One Vodka as
presented on the back cover of Lavender Magazine’s 458th issue
(December 13-26, 2012). The ad presents two thin well-dressed, clean-cut, men
in a bar setting. Both men are holding small glasses of clear liquid over ice
while smiling in an almost flirtatious manner. The bottom also says “a proud
supporter of glaad”; glaad is an organization that supports the GLBT community
(www.glaad.org).
The audience this ad is aimed towards is men, gay or
otherwise; the effects of this ad however, affect more than just the company’s
target audience. The hope of this ad is to influence men to believe that if
they go to a bar, are fit, well-dressed and bought some Ketel One Vodka, then
that will impart a sort of sex appeal that they may otherwise not have. This
message is not appealing. Because whether a person is thin or well-dressed it
does not add to sexual appeal. There are plenty of suave people who wear sweats
and t shirts who have many suitors and are very appealing. Simply because a
person is slender and dresses up does not mean they are sexually appealing.
This ad has the potential to cause harm. In short
term, if men are not as lanky as the two men they see in the ad, they are
likely to feel sad and unattractive. This can lead to these same viewers to try
and lose weight, spend money on frivolous items that they probably do not need,
and worry about their own ability to attract mates. In the long term, if these
same male viewers cannot mold themselves to look more similar to the men in
these ads, it can lead to depression and anxiety in social situations. Overall,
the long term effects of this ad are likely both men and women thinking about
beauty and attractiveness in terms of slenderness instead of personality
attributes and ability.
If someone were to change this ad, the best place to
start is the models. They should not be models. They should look more like
normal people. If this were the case, then it would allow the general public to
see beauty and attractiveness in a more broad view.
Monday, March 4, 2013
Media Monday: A refreshing image
Submitted by TEPF Volunteer
Advertising has such a deep and profound
effect on its viewers, despite their level of awareness. It can convince us not
only to buy products, but to believe the philosophy, principle, or idea. It can
tell you that you are too fat, too ugly, too slow, too smelly, etc., and that
you need this product to be beautiful, desirable, intelligent, athletic, etc.
Our society often focuses on negative ads and will use extreme examples from
fashion labels that show women being objectified, dissected, ridiculed, or
spoken down to, let alone racist, ageist, and ethnocentric. Sadly, those
examples are plentiful, as explored in the film and follow-ups, Killing Me
Softly by Jean Kilbourne. Luckily, there are some ad agencies with more
positive messages.
My ad was found in the Time Magazine
December 31st issue. It is for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation
and features four women standing with arms crossed in front of a dark backdrop.
The camera slightly angled up, giving the women a sense of power. The women are
dressed professionally, but plain clothes. The body language of crossed arms
and smiling faces expresses confidence. The women are between the ages of 30 –
40, which is also the target audience of the ad. The print on the ad suggests
the women are support systems for each other during cancer treatment. The ad is
selling the idea of the foundation doing positive things and suggesting the
audience to donate to them. The ad has a positive message of hope and strength.
The women pictured are not stick thin, but are all of a healthy, average
weight. Although their wrinkles and imperfections are all photoshopped out, the
ad displays a picture perfect version of a successful cancer survivor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)